Even as early as 1939 it was obvious that the days of the
little PzKpfw II tank were numbered, for it lacked both armament and armour,
However, it was in production and quite reliable, so when the need arose for
self-propelled artillery the PzKpfw II was selected to be the carrier for the
10.5- cm (4.13-in) leFH 18 field howitzer. The conversion of the tank hull to
carry the howitzer was quite straightforward, for the howitzer was mounted
behind an open topped armoured shield towards the rear of the hull and the area
where the turret had been was armoured over and the space used for ammunition
stowage. Maximum armour thickness was 18 mm (0.7 in).
The result was the self-propelled howitzer known as the
Wespe (wasp) though its full official designation was rather more cumbersome:
leFH 18/2 auf Fgst Kpfw II (Sf) SdKfz 124 Wespe, but to everyone it was just
the Wespe, It was a very popular little self-propelled weapon that soon gained
for itself a reputation for reliability and mobility. The first of them were
based on the PzKpfw II Ausf F chassis and went into action on the Eastern Front
during 1943. On this front they were used by the divisional artillery batteries
of the Panzer and Panzergrenadier divisions. They were usually organized into
batteries of six howitzers with up to five batteries to an Abteilung
(battalion).
The Wespe was so successful in its artillery support role
that Hitler himself made an order that all available PzKpfw II chassis
production should be allocated to the Wespe alone, and the many other
improvised weapons on the PzKpfw II chassis were dropped or their armament
diverted to other chassis. The main Wespe construction centre was the Famo
plant in Poland, and there production was so rapid that by mid-1944 682
examples had been built. Some time around that date manufacture of the Wespe
ceased, but not before 158 had been completed without howitzers; these vehicles
had the gap in the armour plate for the howitzer sealed off, the space behind
the armour being used for resupply ammunition needed by batteries in the front
line.
A typical Wespe went into action carrying its crew of five,
including the driver, and 32 rounds of ammunition. A Wespe battery was
completely mobile, although some of the vehicles were soft-skinned trucks for
carrying ammunition and other supplies. The forward observers were usually
carried in light armoured vehicles although some batteries used ex- Czech or
captured French tanks for this purpose. Fire orders were relayed back to the
battery by radio, and from the battery fire command post the orders were further
relayed to the gun positions by land lines, The howitzer carried on the Wespe
was the standard 10.5-cm leFH 18 as used by towed batteries (although most were
fitted with muzzle brakes) and so used the same ammunition, They also had the
same range of 10675m (11,675 yards).
The following comments on the employment of the Wespe were
recorded in an experience report written by the commander of the
II.Abteitung/Panzer-Artillerie-Regiment 103 on the offensive and defensive
battles south of Orel from 5 July to 18 August 1943:
The Abteilung was outfitted with two Batterien each with six
le.F.H. auf Panzerfahrgestell ll and one Batterie with six le.F.H. auf
Panzerfahrgestell IV. The mixture of calibers (10.5 cm and 15 cm in a 2 to 1
ratio) met all tactical demands. The objective is to combine direct fire from
the smaller caliber Panzer’s guns, which score direct hits, with indirect area
barrages from artillery, which., because no direct hits are achieved, must gain
superiority through its heavier caliber and number of shell fragments.
Since a breakthrough was not achieved, in spite of the
massed employment of the Panzer forces (from 8 to 10 July 1943), the Batterien
were not employed in mobile offensive actions. Instead, for the most part the
Sf.-Abteilung was assigned the same tasks as the other towed Abteilungen in the
Artillerie·Regiment, that is supporting attacks with limited objectives against
enemy prepared for defense and repulsing enemy attacks.
The advantages of the superior mobility of the
Sf.-Artillerie wasn't utilized in supporting swift progressive Panzer and
infantry attacks. The actual task for which this Sf.-Artillerie was created did
not occur and will not occur in the East until the development of an
operational, penetrating Panzer force. However, it is wrong to conclude that
Sf.-Artillerie should not exist for the present because:
1. The situation may be different on other fronts, for
example, for defending against landing enemy troops by supporting the
counterattacks of Panzer units.
2. The advantages of the thoroughly invulnerable Sf.-Artillerie
was already decisive during the recent battle of attrition in the East. While
the other Abteilungen in the Artillerie-Regiments suffered significant losses
in their firing positions because of continuous aerial attacks and counter- battery
artillery fire, the Sf.-Abteilung was spared ( because of armor protection and
ability to simply drive out of heavy concentrated fire, even though exposed fire
positions had to frequently be chosen due to the situation.
3. The armored Sf.-Artillerie were the only batteries that
maintained the ability to return fire at exactly the critical moment when the
enemy attacked and at the same time the firing positions were covered by
counter-battery fire.
4. Even when on the defense, the Sf.-Artillerie made mobile
deployment possible and therefore it was possible to continually fire artillery
strikes that surprised the enemy. Examples of this is the assembly of the
entire Sf.-Abteilung - all 18 howitzers beside each other in at open or concealed
map coordinates, carrying out a concentrated sudden artillery strike, directly
followed by immediately changing position before effective counter-strikes
could occur. However, in practice this last described method of employment
couldn't be tested during the almost always critical situations because it was absolutely
necessary that all the howitzers in the Abteilung be continuously prepared to
fire.
5. The mobile Sf.-Artillerie was capable of defending itself
against tanks and infantry that had broken through the defenses. This is of
decisive importance during the rapidly shifting battles that occur in the East.
Northeastward of SSnamenskoyje, about 50 kilometers northwest of Orel, using direct
fire the 4.Batterie effectively engaged eight enemy tanks which attacked the
battery’s firing position from the right flank. The howitzers immediately moved
to the right and because the tanks were recognized in the open terrain, already
opened fire at a range of 1500 meters with a mixture of high explosive and
shaped charge shells. As a result of the rapid fire the enemy tanks pulled back
and turned off to-ward another direction. Neither side scored a single hit.
6. Because the Sf.-Artillerie is invulnerable to
counter-battery fire, it is possible to achieve rapid and heavy concentrated
barrages by two or three Batterien pulling into parallel positions in a tight
space. As experienced during recent battles, concentrated fire could be rapidly
and completely achieved. The only mechanical problems that have shown up on the
Wespe are wear on teeth in the steering gear, as well as the brakes being
continuously soaked with oil because oil leaks out of the final drive housing.
Other mechanical problems haven't occurred with the Wespe in spite of being
continuously in action under difficult conditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment